Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 25(11): 1267-1268, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1427284
2.
British Journal of Surgery ; 108(SUPPL 2):ii30, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1254493

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Anecdotal evidence suggest a direct impact of the SARSCOV- 2-pandemic on presentation and severity of major trauma. Method: This observational study from a UK Major Trauma Centre matched a cohort of patients admitted during a 10-week period of the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic (09/03/2020 to 18/05/2020) to a historical cohort admitted during a similar time period in 2019 (11/03/2019 to 20/05/ 2019). Demographic differences, injury method and severity were compared using Fisher's and Chi-squared tests. Multivariable logistic regression examined the associated factors predicting 30-day mortality. Results: Of 642 patients, 405 and 237 were in the 2019 and 2020 cohorts respectively. 1.69%(4/237) of the 2020 cohort tested SARS-CoV-2 positive. There was a 41.5% decrease in trauma admissions in 2020. The 2020 cohort was older (median 46 vs.40 years), more comorbid and frailer (p<0.0015). There was a significant difference in injury method with a decrease in vehicle related trauma, but an increase in falls. There was a 2-fold increased risk ofmortality in the 2020 cohort that in adjustedmodels, was explained by higher injury severity and frailty. Positive SARS-CoV-2 status was not associated with increasedmortality onmultivariable analysis. Conclusions: Patients admitted during the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic were older, frailer, more co-morbid and had an increased risk of mortality.

3.
Tech Coloproctol ; 25(5): 505-520, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1051360

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has caused global disruption to health care. Non-urgent elective surgical cases have been cancelled, outpatient clinics have reduced and there has been a reduction in the number of patients presenting as an emergency. These factors will drastically affect the training opportunities of surgical trainees. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the impact of COVID-19 on surgical training globally. METHODS: The review was performed in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF). Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. RESULTS: The searches identified 499 articles, 29 of which were included in the review. This contained data from more than 20 countries with 5260 trainees and 339 programme directors. Redeployment to non-surgical roles varied across studies from 6% to 35.1%. According to all of the studies, operative experience has been reduced. Knowledge learning had been switched to online platforms across 17 of the studies and 7 reported trainees had increased time to devote to educational/academic activities. All of the studies reporting on mental health report negative associations with increased stress, ranging from 54.9% to 91.6% of trainees. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of COVID-19 on surgical trainees has been experienced globally and across all specialities. Negative effects are not limited to operative and clinical experience, but also the mental health and wellbeing of trainees. Delivery of surgical training will need to move away from traditional models of learning to ensure trainees are competent and well supported.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL